Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julee Gracey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-29 06:15Z 

Julee Gracey


Procedural nomination. Bump from speedy. Neutral. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-24 08:32Z 
 * Articles for deletion/Alike Boggan is relevant, though it didn't mention this person, and there is an assertion of notability beyond being a "DOND babe". —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-24 08:57Z 


 * Delete - fails WP:BIO. No evidence of external coverage on Google. MER-C 08:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mer-C. TSO1D 15:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per WP:BIO and as MER-C says, Google provides hardly no useful results and Google News provides nothing at all. Jayden54 18:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per WP:BIO and as MER-C says, Google provides hardly no useful results and Google News provides nothing at all. Jayden54 18:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.