Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jules Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Jules Williams

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Biography of a psychologist. Claims notability based on television appearances; however, I can't find any external sources confirming this, and the person's own site refers in a vague way to Sky TV, specifically Psychic TV which does not look like something that would make the subject notable. The external sites used as references are not all about the same person - the first site belongs to a female therapist called Jules Williams, in Nottingham, and the second site to a male therapist by the same name, in London (and he appears to be the one the article is about) ; the third site advertises him as well. Neither of the references qualifies as a reliable source as they are all advertisements. The article's author created two articles about Williams' methods and concepts, both of which were deleted in Articles for deletion/Intuitive Counselling. I believe there may be some COI here, and in any case I find no evidence of notability. bonadea contributions talk 18:23, 31 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete sounds fairly non notable, I attached a prod earlier. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I deleted the external link to the other Jules Williams, which only served to confuse the issue. --bonadea contributions talk 15:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete fails WP:BIO through a lack of reliable sources to establish notability. Drawn Some (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and btw I certainly would not call someone who advertises as 'an exceptional Intuitive Investigator and remote viewer" and "past life regression coach" a psychologist. Whatever his profession is, I see no indication he is notable in it. DGG (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment You are right, I ought to have written "therapist" or "counsellor" instead of "psychologist". I don't think he calls himself a psychologist either. --bonadea contributions talk 09:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Seems to be not notable and fails WP:BIO. -- Barras ||  talk  10:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.