Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juli Berwald


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 13:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Juli Berwald

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article does not appear to meet WP:BIO and is heavily edited by only a few users. Djrfid (talk) 05:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Appears to be widely covered. Spineless certainly passes NBOOK with reviews, and together with Berwald's work in journalism appears to plausibly meet WP:AUTHOR.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 06:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I'ma say keep too, it's well-sourced.  Wiki Macaroons Cinnamon? 07:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs tidying, but certainly has merit and some sources. Don't see why "heavily edited by only a few users" matters at all. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.