Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bascom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Julia Bascom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. The work she is doing is honorable, but she does not qualify for a Wikipedia page at the moment. The books she has edited or written have not received any significant coverage either. All the Ghits are trivial mentions or quotes in the media. Susana Hodge (talk) 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Seems to pass WP:GNG. Articles about subject in Huffington Post, Psychology Today , Voice of America and over 50  non- trivial mentions or quotations in The Atlantic, Business Insider, LA Times, The Guardian, on CNN and ABC News, etc.   CBS 527 Talk 02:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per sources noted above. ABF99 (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.