Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bascom (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Julia Bascom
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

See Talk:Julia Bascom for the original reason posted anonymously Ylevental (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep She is a notable advocate for people with autism. I've added some more sources which show that she has been consulted for the creation of Sesame Street's first autistic character, addressed the UN and more. Her work, which is referenced on the talk page is noticed by others in the field, including the Oxford Handbook on disability. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Enough coverage in reliable sources, appears to be notable. Pam  D  09:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Now adequately sourced.--Ipigott (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the improvement to the article by adding more references to reliable sources coverage, the subject clearly passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 23:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: This is certainly adequately sourced and the subject is a notable advocate. Valadius (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Julia Bascom is an important person to autistic people. The people suggesting this page be deleted are attempting to silence their importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.112.166.94 (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sourced well enough. Plenty more sources out there too (as was evident in the last deletion discussion). This article should have been tagged for improvement, not deletion. --Avenue (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.