Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Fetherstone

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 05:24, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Julia Fetherstone
Hoax. -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

There is no threat of vandalism, nor is getting people interested in the site to come and join this fine community and express their views a violation of the rules.- Keep- 'TagTeam 10:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)TagTeam'
 * Delete -- Longhair | Talk 10:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Erm, how is it a hoax? ··gracefool |&#9786; 10:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Because she didn't stand for the Assembly, there's no evidence of any of the claims made in the article, and every other contribution by this serial hoax artist has just been a completely nonsense story about one of several real (but non-notable anyway) students from the Australian National University. Ambi 10:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah. In that case, Delete ··gracefool |&#9786; 10:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Sorry I was going to explain, but it was quite a load to list at once. Ambi explained perfectly. Students having fun at keyboards, again. -- Longhair | Talk 10:30, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 10:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Ambi she is not a student at the Australian National University, what makes you say otherwise?
 * Just about everyone else you've written about is. And everything you've written is nonsense. Points for humor, but the joke is a bit old. Ambi 10:44, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * No, none of the subjects of my articles have been about ANU Students - my IP originates from there sure, but would you care to back up your assertion about the subjects instead of the author??
 * Why don't you just stop writing fake articles and be done with it? If you want to write a real article, make sure it can be verified as true and try logging in to do it. -- RussellG
 * Nothing is verifiable, some of it is verifiably wrong, and I know half of the real people you (the anon) have written stories about personally. Nice try, but no cigar. Ambi 10:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * It's not me that's writing them. You have me confused with the other guy. RussellG 10:53, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * (sorry, I meant to direct it at the other guy, but I worded it badly) Ambi 10:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I think it's quite vindicating that the article no longer seems to be up for deletion. What of the principle of good faith that this project is notionally founded on? None of the above assertions have been backed up with truth.
 * Please don't remove VFD notices. This is considered vandalism, and will lead to you being blocked. Ambi 10:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I have done no such thing, Ambi. I appreciate you are acting in good faith but could you please be more considered before accusing me in future, I'd also point you to the included references in the article as well as to my repeated request for you to back up your assertions. Jamesss 10:54, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Ambi likes Canadians, huh?
 * Delete as unverifiable. Deb Foskey is an MLA for Molonglo not Ginninderra. The Elections ACT website shows that she did not run for the seat of Ginninderra . Nor did she stand for Brindabella or Molonglo .There wasn't a feminist party stand at all. Therefore, at best she is a student at the ANU of no particular notability at the moment. Capitalistroadster 12:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- 'JoJo 13:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
 * Keep Naughty Ambi! Jamesss 13:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing says hoax like sockpuppets. --W(t) 13:39, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
 * I agree, so the fact that Ambi has brought in a ringer like you proves our case. Bazing!
 * Look, we can play the "who has more friends?" game too!- 'JoJo 13:56, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)JoJo'
 * Delete this and all articles created by the hoax vandal, and disregard the sockpuppet "keep" votes, also Columbia 14:00, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can someone do something about this JoJo vandal, please? Proto 14:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite the fact that she is, in fact, very cute. Assuming the claims about her political career were true, she would not be notable. --Habap 14:40, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 14:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Captain, I'm giving her all the sockpuppets I've got! Delete. jglc | t | c 15:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Cute girl, though. jglc | t | c 15:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete bad sockpuppets, bad! --Etacar11 16:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Very cute- Keep - 'Hotpants 07:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Hotpants'
 * Users only edits are to vote keep on Longhair's VFD nominations. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sockpuppet-backed hoax. This is a recording. --FCYTravis 09:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * PArt of her is real, we don't know she isn't worthy of an entry. Maybe we could go on a fact finding mission beyond "google"- Until I see strong evidence to draw this into disrepute it's just one anonymous persons word against anothers. Keep- 'Freezer 09:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)Freezer'
 * Account created today. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - rubbish about non-famous person backed up sockpuppets, threats of recruiting more "voters", potential vandalism - Skysmith 10:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Only votes and contributions have been to this and other linked VfD's. This username has also vandalised User:Sjakkalle's Talk page. jglc | t | c 13:31, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsubstantiated claims. Has not appeared in Woroni recently as quoted. Was not on recent ACT electoral ballot etc. Wikistyler
 * Delete - Non-notable, vanity. -Eisnel 06:46, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .