Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Williams (academic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  13:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Julia Williams (academic)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable academic, misses the bar for WP:NACADEMIC #8 as was never editor-in-chief, not much I can find in books or google. BrigadierG (talk) 11:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Health and fitness, Medicine,  and United Kingdom. Owen&times;  &#9742;  13:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's really scraping the bottom of the barrel when you list getting a PhD as an "award"! Athel cb (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  15:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  15:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I went through the page and tried to improve it, but it wasn't worth the time - does not satisfy WP:PROF. Qflib (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Scopus profile shows c. 850 citations, I don't know if that is high or low for the field: . ResonantDistortion 19:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.