Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Gonsalves (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Gee hammer, maybe WP:SOGOTP should become policy. While it's clear that no delete buttons are going to be pushed at this time I'm still divided on whether to close "k" or "n" again. Per Nsk92's sources I think I'm going to "get off the pot" but if a closer examination finds them lacking I would have no objection to this being renominated in a month or 2. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Julian Gonsalves
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Dubious notability. Thin sources, only one valid assertation. Last two AFDs closed as no consensus due to lack of participation. Let's go or get off the pot, hmm? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:55, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep (a bit weakish, but still). The award listed in the article does check out, and there are examples of detailed biographical coverage of him by third-party sources, e.g. in these two books: . Also, appears to have won some kind of an award from the UN in 1991. IMO, passes WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep per WP:GNG and the sources listed by Nsk92. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.