Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Hook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Julian Hook

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested Prod. Not notable. Of the references listed, #1 lists subject on a subpage as the review editor, #2-6 do not mention the subject at all, #7 mentions receiving a fellowship on a subpage. Using "Julian Hook" and "music" there are only 4 GNews hits (1 article by subject, 1 behind a paywall, and 2 on student achievements). Some GScholar hits, about normal for a university professor, but appearing to fall short of WP:PROF (and fails the 9 listed criteria there as well). GregJackP  Boomer!   16:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete due to the lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. At the very least, stub this back to something verifiable and encyclopedic instead of the combination of cv and puff piece that it is now. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete He's an associate professor, a category which rarely ranks as notable, and his achievements are run-of-the-mill for that position. Besides, the article is enough to turn one's stomach. "Hook is well respected by students. He learns the names of each student in his large lecture classes and refers to them by name." Oh, please. --MelanieN (talk) 02:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.