Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Koltun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Julian Koltun

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. Google reveals little. I see no indication that the subject is worthy of inclusion. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not surprised. If all that happened in the early 1980s, there's not going to be much online information. Someone with Polish language skills should look for paper sources. - Mgm|(talk) 09:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Does this have anything to do with Juliancolton? X clamation point  02:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. As someone with Polish language skills I was hoping to be able to ride to the rescue here, but, rather bizarrely, it appears that someone with Malay language skills is needed to evaluate the only potential source that I could find online. I would add that I was living in Poland at the time when the article subject was active, and have some recollection of the case, but, of course, that doesn't count for anything when it comes to verifiability or notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think there's anything there that we haven't already got. Note that only the first line is about Julian Koltun; the rest are about other Polish serial killers.  As for the sentence that is about him, it translates as "Julian Koltun, raped and murdered many women in Eastern Poland".  It's a false lead.  Soap Talk/Contributions 23:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. One dubious source without a single court announcement to further explain the case is a very thin base for an article about an alleged serial killer. Fails both verifiability and notability. There's also the WP:LIVING worth considering here. --Poeticbent talk  01:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It seems there are three sources, actually. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: there doesn't appear to be enough sources to satisfy BLP requirements or improve the article past its current stub status. momo  ricks  02:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.