Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Roughton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Suffolk Wildlife Trust. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Julian Roughton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I think this is a fairly clear A7: no claim to notability in the text and no indication of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. (Contested speedy and prod.) – hysteria18 (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep 9 sources are shown a lot of which are from the BBC therefore reliable sources exist.  Wilbysuffolk   Talk to me  18:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Far from a db-A7. However, I've expanded this but its all about the trust. I propose a merge of what I've added into the main article and then redirect his name. There is nothing biographical on the web about him whatsoever but his trust is most certainly notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect: redirect to the Trust - his only notability is as its Chief Executive (or MD, according to the article). If someone else was in that post, they'd be getting quoted in the media in just the same way.  Pam  D  21:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge: This person is not notable enough to have his own article. We can't have an article for the owner of every single company and anyone who was mentioned by the BBC. Adam mugliston  Talk  18:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.