Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julianne Binard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Julianne Binard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress with virtually no coverage in RS and only minor roles. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No RS Agricola44 (talk) 13:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage anywhere to indicate notability sufficient to pass WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. She's had some bit parts in various films here and there, but nothing significant. The article claims she will "star" in "Il était une seconde fois", a film being produced by a 1 employee production studio in Paris (see listing). Also be aware; the same article on fr.wikipedia has been creation protected. The same IP that has been repeatedly recreating the article over there has also significantly edited the article here and added a link from fr:Il était une seconde fois to here, since they can't link it locally there due to multiple deletions, creating a sort of a circular "notable because she's notable" loop. Also, the prime creator of the content here has uploaded a copyright violation to Commons several times, and is on a last warning over there for the behavior (see c:User talk:Azidonis). What Commons does isn't relevant to keeping this article, but I raise it because we appear to have one or more people striving very hard to push an article forward about this person, regardless of any policies or guidelines we have on fr.wikipedia, Commons, or here. I'm not suggesting a salting, but rather those who are interested may want to watch this article if it gets deleted. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Hamelett (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep but... There are probably just fans of her trying to make her known by a largest public via the Internet. Because they are interested in her and whatnot. That is the reason why they’re mostly using IMDb, etc as sources whose informations are probably written by the agency itself; given that they are the only sources we know + her CV via her talent agency. Even though pushing the article about her forward the way they do doesn’t match with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, I fully understand, those people are trying to keep and let some traces of capital and basic informations regarding her. One day she’ll definitely be even more famous by getting more and more important roles in the future. We’re waiting. But to conclude; don’t other sites consider Wikipedia as a non-reliable source likewise? We may stay sceptical about that. --
 * Delete Non notable, No RS, possibly promotional. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.