Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Aberg Robison (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Julie Aberg Robison
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Survived VfD in 2005 by way of a no-consensus closure. We've since developed WP:NPOL and WP:GNG which this woman fails. Cary, North Carolina is certainly not a big enough town to grant a presumption of notability to council members, and there aren't enough non-local sources about this woman to justify keeping the article under GNG.

See also Articles for deletion/Marla Dorrel (2nd nomination), running concurrently and also kept in 2005. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:49, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:49, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete even the mayor of Cary would not be default notable, members of the city council even less so.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:NPOL/WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  talk  15:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. City councillors receive an automatic presumption of notability only if they serve in major, internationally famous global cities on the order of New York City, Chicago, Toronto or London — outside of that narrow range of cities, city councillors are deemed notable only if they can be reliably sourced well enough to qualify as special cases of significantly greater and more nationalized notability than most other city councillors in non-global cities But this is referenced to just one glancing namecheck of her existence in a local newspaper article that isn't about her to any non-trivial degree, which is not the type or volume of sourcing it takes. Bearcat (talk) 23:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.