Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Brown (business person)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article creator (and advancer of the sole "keep" vote) hasn't edited in over two weeks. If they return to editing and would like to continue work on this article, I'll happily restore and WP:USERFY it. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Julie Brown (business person)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looked at this several times.Some coverage but think she fails WP:BIO. Bit of a puff piece article. scope_creep (talk) 21:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Reads like a WP:AUTOBIO. No substantial coverage in reliable sources, just trivial mentions in a variety of sources, several of which are non-independent. FuriouslySerene (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * This page is not an autobio. It was created as part of the BBC 100 Women 2016 Wikipedia Editathon. I would request that the page is retained for another six months so that I (as the author and a newcomer to wikipedia) have time to create more pages and also so that further references can be added to the page which is the subject of this discussion. Keep Thanks Spring Chicken (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why you want the page kept 6 months so you can create other pages - you would still be free to create other pages whether or not this one is deleted. I have no objection to the page being WP:USERFIED (read that link if you don't know what that means) to your namespace so you can try to track down and add more substantial coverage, and to remove the unsourced promotional material, although I've seen no evidence that such coverage exists. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.