Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Elston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 01:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Julie Elston

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite the text, this is an article about an Associate Professor at an American University. This level in academia is deemed inherently notable. The remaining refs show that she has won an award and has been an editor on two publications. Nowhere is there any evidence of independent notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 12:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Google scholar lists five papers with over 100 citations, and an h-index of nearly 20. It's not enough even to put her in to the top 25% of economists in her state, let alone the top 10% of the US or world   but I think it may be enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Keep -Ipigott (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.