Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Goiorani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Personally, I find it unlikely that any in-depth coverage of this person will surface in the future and I sympathize strongly with the view voiced by. However, the consensus view appears to be to keep this permastub. Randykitty (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Julie Goiorani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No WP:SIGCOV, one ref is a WP:TRIVIALMENTION, the other does not link to who it says &#91;Username Needed&#93; 12:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I fixed the second link. And she played at a World and European Championship with the senior team. Kante4 (talk) 12:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment She has certainly played at European level (does that give presumed notability? France placed 9th the year she played). However, I have not found where she is listed in a World Championship team? It doesn't help that the only team listed on the France women's national handball team page is for 2017. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The first ref shows that she was in the squad and this link should sort it out, displaying her stats at the 2013 WC. Will add it to the article. Kante4 (talk) 13:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Thank you - as she has played at world championship level, I believe that she is presumed notable. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as "presumed notable". &#91;Username Needed&#93; 12:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Playing at the highest level of their sport (WC/EC) makes her notable. "A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition or won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Kante4 (talk) 12:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Not enough !votes to generate accurate consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 21:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Played at a World Championship, that makes her notable per above. I don't know why this had to be relisted three times. Smartyllama (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. From what I see, no secondary sources have provided coverage of the subject's career.  While we know from primary sources that the subject indeed participated in some significant competitions, they have not played internationally and are not likely to have received significant coverage (WP:SPORTSPERSON).  Indeed we know the subject has received no such coverage.  I cannot see how this subject currently warrants inclusion of a biography.   AGK  &#9632;  22:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So playing at a World Championship isn't playing internationally? Smartyllama (talk) 13:28, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.