Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie O'Halloran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Julie O'Halloran

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only claimed aspect of notability is participation in a project that itself is of questionable notability. If the webshow were to be deemed notable this would be at best a redirect to that article. The cited sources do not show notability by Wikipedia's standards and fail WP:RS rules to even be listed in other articles. DreamGuy (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Dreamguy is incorrect "participation in a project that itself is of questionable notability" Spellfury has been deemed notable. She's the lead actress in the show and a notable webseries actress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.9.239 (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per meeting WP:ENT. The nominator might personally "question" the notability of Spellfury but the many citations in that article and its coverage in independent secondary coverage in suitable genre sources Tubefilter, Wired.com and Ain't it Cool News (as shared in previous Spellfury AFD) shows otherwise.  Yes, that article will benefit from cleanup, but it is notable per guideline... whether one likes the project or not.  And as this BLP contains information that is unsuitable in an article about the webseries, a merge is not a suitable option.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)    01:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.