Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Stoffer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Julie Stoffer
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not a notable enough person--anything substantial can be covered in the Real World and Electric Playground articles. Suggest no redirect as she is too obscure and it's not clear to which article this should be redirected. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Real World: New Orleans. I think it is clear where the article should be redirected. If she's mainly known as a cast member on the Real World (which got her the role on The Electric Playground), why not redirect to The Real World: New Orleans?--hkr Laozi speak  08:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * keep or redirect - though seems like keep is fine. though as a blp article it needs watchers, and vigourous sourcing. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The one bit of vandalism was fixed almost immediately and was fairly minor. I've been watching it since it was recreated and obviously others have been too. Hobit (talk) 20:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep sourcing in the article more than meets GNG. Notice there was a DrV recently where the userspace draft was widely accepted. See my . Hobit (talk) 20:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The nom's confession that he can't figure out where a redirect should point is a good indication that separate notability may have been established. Appears to have multiple independent RS'es covering her in multiple contexts. Jclemens (talk) 16:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.