Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Wagner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Julie Wagner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACTOR. Not enough sources to support a BLP. RetiredDuke (talk) 18:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an exemple of how badly maintained Wikipedia is. That a sub-standard biography like this has lasted for 9 years is a disgrace. It lacks any reliable sources, which is bad enough. Sadly, there are some editors who will defend any article on an actress no matter how sub-standard the sourcing. This is doubly bad because calling her an actress is stretching the term, she is more a bodydouble and stuntwoman. This is no where near passing the notability guidelines for entertainers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete A search for sources brings back trivial passing mentions of other people with the same name, but not obviously this one. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.