Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Zeilinger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Valley2 city ‽ 02:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Julie Zeilinger

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Claims of notability do not meet WP:BIO. Independent blogger with a few minor school awards to her credit. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, with no sources, this cannot possibly pass WP:BLP.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 12:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable independent sources of notability exist (no books or news reports). Additionally, the article does not assert the importance of the subject. --Odie5533 (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, enough alleged awards to satisfy me as to claims of importance, but appears altogether nonnotable. What's more, the article is totally POV in her favour.  Nyttend (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  00:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Well short of the general notability guidelines as well as the bio ones mentioned above. —C.Fred (talk) 00:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- Notability is not asserted as per WP:BIO. Hitro   talk  19:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.