Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julien Amiel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Julien Amiel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. There is one article in Hype magazine, which is shortened without attribution in another source used, and the US journal which self-describes as "We bring you the best Premium WordPress Themes that perfect for news, magazine, personal blog, etc." and clearly isn't a reliable source. I haven't found any better sources online, and his feat isn't so remarkable that one could expect such sources to exist (there are dozens of people who surpass his achievement). Fails WP:BIO. Fram (talk) 11:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Mathematics,  and France. Fram (talk) 11:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Note that sources like this one from RTL, in itself a reliable source, doesn't mention Amiel at all, despite being used to source his 2019 effort. Fram (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried finding mentions of him in .fr websites; little comes up, some in relation to his father or another relative who appears to be a scholar. Oaktree b (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO spam sources. The sources cited in the nomination are examples. I've blocked the author for this. MER-C 09:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, removed two sources that are known SEO junk. The rest don't look any better. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.