Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julien Legrand

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE Meelar 15:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Julien Legrand
Suspect vanity. User made two contributions on 3 August and hasn't been back. Article claims person has won several international titles. I can not find evidence of any international titles. I have found evidence of at least one age-under-16 Australian state title, and possibly a similar national title (hard to decipher). Does this make this person of interest sufficient for an encyclopedia entry? Frankly, I'm uncertain. Normally, this would be placed for speedy under the new vanity rule, but I'm putting it up for VfD because of the titles this person has received, rather than speedy. Your thoughts? --Durin 17:42, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  --Cyberjunkie | Talk 12:21, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. PS: what is the "new vanity rule"? Sdedeo 18:02, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Under Criteria for speedy deletion Articles rule 7. See Deletion of vanity articles for more information. --Durin 18:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Only 2 relevant google hits on "julien legrand" +Judo. Nn vanity page. Dottore So
 * Delete; non-notable vanity. Jaxl | talk 19:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Would need clear evidence of being a junior world champion to be worth keeping. Osomec 00:16, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity--Cyberjunkie | Talk 12:21, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete countless pan-pacific, state and national titles - a sixteen-year-old should be able to count a maximum of one trophy a year of each type since he was nine - especially as an "accomplished academic". --Scott Davis Talk 14:24, 23 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.