Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet of the Spirits (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (non-admin closure), as per consensus. I suspect Giulietta Masina would be pleased. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Juliet of the Spirits (song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Disputed redirect of non-notable single, scheduled for release "in 2008". Fails WP:MUSIC. Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Disputed?  Sheesh you make it sound so harsh.  Song is confirmed as "the next single" on B-52's website, although no firm date is set.  Don't see the harm in keeping this as it is no less notable than other "future singles".  If it does get deleted, so be it, as it can easily be recreated once a date is announced and sourced. - eo (talk) 18:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There seems to be at least some confirmation outside of the artists themselves. Looking on ASCAP ACE title search, title #400822811 is the song in question. I'm not sure if that qualifies as independent confirmation however. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 18:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable band, notable single. Although no objection to future deletion if it ends up not getting released for some reason. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: some sourcing would help.  Corvus cornix  talk  20:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Here you go: Dallas Morning News. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * In the article itself. :)   Corvus cornix  talk  23:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Like someone said: notable band, notable single. That and there's a source and I don't know if anyone has put it in the article istself, but I'll be more than happy too. LoveLaced (talk) 01:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.