Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio César Ramírez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per found references and consensus. Geschichte (talk) 10:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Julio César Ramírez

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Could potentially scrape by WP:NFOOTY by the skin of its teeth (even that's not sure), but completely fails WP:GNG. The consensus in this scenario is to delete. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:NFOOTBALL by a long way as per Football Database. In terms of sources, the Ovación source is really good. The only other source I can find is this routine transfer announcement. Maybe others will find some more in-depth coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comments Found him on soccerway, I am not sure is that five fully pro games? Govvy (talk) 17:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * - that's a different player. The subject of the article is a Uruguayan player born in 1974. His Soccerway page is empty. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * okay, cheers. Govvy (talk) 19:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - over 300 professional appearances - clearly meets NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 18:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Subject has more than 300 appearances in fully professional leagues, so would just about "scrape by WP:NFOOTY by the skin of [his] teeth", and the article already cites one lengthy piece from a Uruguayan national newspaper's sports website, which to me wouldn't indicate he "completely fails WP:GNG". cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, clearly passes GNG and NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above. Govvy (talk) 10:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.