Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio viskovich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Julio viskovich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inadequately sourced biography of a writer. The Forbes source is mere mention, and the other two sources seem closely connected. I am unable to find sources that discuss the subject in depth. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. - MrX 19:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see a credible claim of significance either. It seems to be a vanity article. Why would you not nominate this for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've had CSDs rejected for less notable claims than " known for his book "Sellarketing" " or " He has been honored for his contributions to modern selling by Forbes", so I decided to err on the side of caution. What passes as a "significant claim" varies widely, depending on which admin is reviewing the CSD.- MrX 00:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Had I seen it proposed for deletion as A7, and I was unable to find sources to establish notability, I would have deleted it. Empty phrases like "known for" and "has been honored" without specifics or sources aren't credible claims of significance. Accordingly, I have changed my initial comment here to 'delete'. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough notability. -- Green  C  02:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 20:16, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.