Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julissa Miro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 01:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Julissa Miro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A WP:BLP for a model that has no indication of notability. The only source being used is her own personal website. Doing searches turns up a few social media and business profiles, but no sources indicating notability for the individual. I had initially PRODed this, but had not realized that it had already been PRODed a decade before and contested by an IP, thus making it ineligible for another PROD. Rorshacma (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. Well... maybe. Google Books digitized a collection of the Peruvian periodical Caretas from (probably) 1999. As usual when Google Books tries to handle bound periodical volumes, it choked pretty hard trying to figure out the bibliographical information and returns nothing accurate or useful instead (I hate this so much, I wrote an essay about it!). In any case, snippet view provides us with an article apparently titled "Julissa de Moda" that begins "Aun en el competitivo mundo del modelaje venezolano, la limeña Julissa Miró Quesada Woodman destaca como modelo exclusiva de la agencia Mariela Centeno. Es desde allí que ha sido solicitada por fotógrafos y ..." That sounds promising, and Caretas is an well-regarded and reliable source, but there's no way to know from just that snippet whether that text is independent of Miro, whether it has sufficient depth of coverage, or indeed, whether it's an actual article rather than advertising copy! The best I can get Google to tell me is that this was somewhere between issue 1583-1591, so I don't even have an easy citation to look up. Meanwhile, a very much unreliable source suggests that she was also on the cover of the Mexican magazine Veintitantos in June 2001, and of the Venezuelan fashion-focused Complot (but with no date specified). I can't confirm those appearances, much less whether the periodicals in question devoted any measure of legitimate coverage to her. I'm not confident that there's sufficient coverage to warrant a keep here, but on the off chance there's someone taking note of this AFD with access to pre-Internet-era Spanish-language fashion magazines, well... Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Give a relist to see if solid RS can be provided for GNG; otherwise it is heading for Delete.
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. A search yielded absolutely nothing.4meter4 (talk) 02:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 11:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Last relist, since no additional feedback since first relist...

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough demonstrated coverage to pass WP:GNG, no prejudice on recreation if other sources end up existing. SportingFlyer  T · C  03:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.