Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Gius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep sourced and per issue of one source being from a paper he edited the article in question was written 20 years after he retired and 11 years since he a had died so they are independent. Gnangarra 14:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Julius Gius

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notable? Willy turner (talk) 23:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'd say those links down at the bottom are references.  From the first it seems like he's notable, assuming it's reliable.  Going to wikify it now.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs)  —Preceding comment was added at 00:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, after vastly cleaning it up (meaning removing a ton of cruft), we're left with a stub. Asside from the redlinks, it looks fine now.  Not sure what to do about those.  The article also had a problem with dates; it said he died in 1986 but retired in 1987.  Date of death needs to be added now, since I don't know which to use.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has sources demonstrating notability. I've done a bit of editing too. The hall of fame source says he died in 1996, and the second source quoted by the original author does talk about him, so I've reinstated it to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The only sources asserting notability are from the paper he edited. This cannot be good enough. NBeale (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.