Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Pitzman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. per the new sources added (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Julius Pitzman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete Not even clear whether he is architect or engineer. No Rs. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  08:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although admittedly right on the edge of notability, Pitzman is legit.  His claim to fame was in developing the private place in St. Louis Missouri, mostly in the 1880s and 1890s, a residential enclave something like a modern gated community.  This was unique to St. Louis and significant in the history of urban planning in the U.S.  This significance of the private place isn't really brought out in wikipedia, but I've expanded Pitzman a little to try to help.  --Lockley (talk) 03:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Looks just notable enough . That is, the sources seem sufficient. Hobit (talk) 00:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – I've added more references, as there were several articles in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that discuss him to some extent. There is enough there for WP:N notability. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 16:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.