Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Weinberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Julius Weinberg

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is about a person who is not, and has not been, in the public domain for any significant incident or for any significant amount of time, thereby making the article meaningless to Wikipedia Count-kostaki (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * keep, easily satisfies WP:PROF, by virtue of position, citation, and news coverage. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Citation link has a long list of publications to peruse. - BalthCat (talk) 04:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Not a whole lot of citability in googlescholar. However, according to the info page at the City University of London, he is an elected fellow of the Royal College of Physicians. That seems sufficient for passing citerion 3 of WP:PROF. Kinoq (talk) 22:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes at least criteria 3 (FRCP) and 6 (acting vice chancellor - note that in England vice-chancellor is the top job, with the chancellor being a figurehead) of WP:PROF. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep on basis of position at least. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.