Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius tiangson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Julius tiangson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

At the moment, the article reads completely like a campaign advertisment. That's horrible, but the more important fact is that we're talking about a mere political candidate that isn't particularly notable. This looks like a clear-cut case to me of an article that should be removed from Wikipedia. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as although my searches found a few results, I see nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. No establishment of notability per WP:GNG or WP:Politician.--4scoreN7 (talk) 12:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * As always, unelected candidates in forthcoming elections do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced case that he was already eligible for a Wikipedia article before being named a candidate, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. He'll certainly get an article if he wins the seat once the campaign is over, but nothing here already gets him an article now. Delete, without prejudice against recreation on October 19 if he wins. Bearcat (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, being an unelected candidate for a federal election does not make a person notable. They would have to be notable prior to becoming a candidate, and all I see when I read the article is a blatant promotional advertisement, nothing that would support a claim of notability. Since when do Wikipedia articles detail the platforms of candidates? If he's elected on October 19, then like all other elected MPs, the subject would meet notability requirements and an article can be added at that time. Cmr08 (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.