Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juluk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 04:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Juluk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is still unsourced and still lacks coordinate information. There are also no links to this page in the mainspace.  Eye snore  (PC) 17:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep If an article concerns a populated place, then the norm is for it to be retained and the nominator's concerns are a matter of article improvement. AllyD (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly this place, which indicates multiple possible spellings: Zuluk, Djuluk. See also Google Maps. AllyD (talk) 19:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  04:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep it appears to be a real place (per AllyD above), so is kept. No sourcing and no coords is unfortunate but are not reasons to delete. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.