Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumbleme (digital encryption service)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 23:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Jumbleme (digital encryption service)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Email encryption company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Not sure how it made it through AFC, but was PRODed and refunded. Website now redirects to one that sells Twitter followers. Fuebaey (talk) 03:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now and I would've notified the AfC accepting user and the PRODder but they seem to have since retired, my searches found links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam though not much so there's likely not much for an article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  17:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - other than a few brief mentions at News, Books and Highbeam, absolutely no in-depth coverage. Add to that the promotional tone of the article and it's a clear delete.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.