Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jump! (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nom. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Jump! (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found only one review on Rotten Tomatoes. Nothing else suitable enough was found to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE. The Film Creator (talk) 18:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Austria,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: I've added some more to the article, including a second review with the Quad City Times, as well as some coverage of the production. It's not great and I won't be upset if this ultimately closes as a delete, but I think it's enough for a weak keep. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, this took a ton of digging to find what I did. The name is so common that a lot of what I found was buried under false hits and the typical junk results. There may be a little more out there, I get the impression that there may be, but I don't think that it's going to be a huge amount of sourcing FWIW. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. In addition to what RotP found, there are also a few paragraphs from Ann Hornaday in The Washington Post at, available through WP:TWL. That gives us three reviews plus additional coverage, which in my view is enough to clear the GNG threshold. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this nomination per consensus. The Film Creator (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.