Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JumpStart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 16:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

JumpStart

 * -- (View AfD)

I marked this article for deletion because it is a corporate advertisement. A short, purely informative, article would be appropriate, but this is not. Kearnsdm 00:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

I edited the article per this discussion. I am always happy to make changes; I think the above contributors could have been more thoughtful in their contributions.
 * Note Multiple accounts who contributed to this AfD are suspected sockpuppets per Requests for checkuser/Case/Infomanager. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, very notable series of edutainment games. If you think it is written in an advertisement-like format, be bold and fix it. &mdash;   Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  18:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 20:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep; AFD is not cleanup. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep per invalid rationale for nomination. Tarinth 21:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but needs cleanup. --Alan Au 06:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable software series, and doesn't appear to have a spammy tone. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly remember playing them as a kid (although that's kind of WP:ILIKEITish...) and the article isn't that bad. Just completely unsourced and a stub. AFD is not cleanup - although this article desperately needs a cleanup. -Ryanbomber 12:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Needs cleanup, not deletion. --Scottie theNerd 16:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. Jessica Anne Stevens 22:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep although some clean-up is required. Paul D. Meehan 05:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per discussion above. Brad Guzman 20:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep stub seems suitable Joel Jimenez 04:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.