Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jump Festa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy/Snow Keep. Bad faith nomination by sockpuppets. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Jump Festa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very blatantly fails WP:N, WP:V, WP:GNG, WP:ADVERTISEMENT, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:NEVENT, WP:SPS and WP:PROMO Wikipedian Forevermore (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC) — Wikipedian Forevermore (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete hilariously non-notable, not even close to meeting WP:N Robert Rockers (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC) — Robert Rockers (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is a stub and in rather poor shape, but a quick Google search of the news section shows a lot of coverage of announcements made at Jump Festa and events that occure. A search of Anime News Network's own site also brings up coverage of these announcements and events. I'll also note that there is suspicious activity between, , and in that all three accounts were created today and whose only edits are related this article. It is very evident that these three accounts are the same person. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy/Strong Keep As likely Possible Bad faith nomination by known sock Long-term abuse/Cow cleaner 5000. Even if that is not the case, the RS specialist game/anime press report on this event as it is often used to announce or even show new entries in franchises published by the parent publication.SephyTheThird (talk) 21:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * While the check user did confirm that the three accounts are the same user, it did not confirm that they are socks of CC2K. —Farix (t &#124; c) 23:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed. However given the circumstances I don't see any reason to retract that part of my statement (I have tweaked it and my vote). Instead I think the second part is still worthy of a speedy close as the event itself is well covered by RS sources. Some of which I see you have added. SephyTheThird (talk) 23:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Someone should open up a sock investigation here as 3 different accounts is a red flag. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * As noted by The Farix, the investigation has been completed which confirmed the three accounts as "technically indistinguishable" from each other.SephyTheThird (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep WP:-spam WP:BADFAITH nom by longtime sock with an overly anti-anime bias. Nominator is blocked so I think we can call WP:SNOW and save six days of discussion.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.