Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumper 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   REDIRECT Non-admin closing due to un-contentious and unanimous early consensus that the article should be redirected to the Jumper article, given that the content of the new article is pulled directly from the original's section on the possible sequel. Additionally, article creator has been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  04:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Jumper 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:CRYSTAL. All information regarding the film is purely speculative, at this point, as far as I can tell. I will rapidly retract my nomination if somebody can find something better than a blog post or an IMDB page to support that this movie will actually exist. The title is apparently still very much up for debate (WP:HAMMER) -- this article was originally giving a title to the movie that I simply can't find support for anywhere. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  08:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (alhough arguably a redirect candidate) Well as the creation of a sock account of the oft-blocked User:Alexcas11, it might meet CSD G5. The edits since have been to remove the obviously bogus information and to format refs, but the section that remains in the article is still in essence a cut'n'paste of the sequel section of the original Jumper article So, either this article should be deleted or instead, speedily redirected to the sequel section of the  Jumper (film) article. Of course, if and/or when, production on a proposed sequel gets to the point where an article won't fail WP:NFF, then an article will probably be created.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 20:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to sequel section of Jumper, as above. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Agreed, I think a redirect is the appropriate way to go. If nobody else comes in and has different thoughts I'll just go ahead and non-admin close and redirect the article. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  22:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Yup, just striking my delete as a redirect seems to be the better way to go here. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 23:22, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.