Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 10th Suicides at Guantánamo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

June 10th Suicides at Guantánamo

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails WP:N. I couldn't find a single reliable source that references this study or otherwise indicates why it is notable. No Google Scholar, Books, News archives hits, and only 61 distinct Google hits, most of them from Wikipedia and its mirrors. Replacing Denbeuax with Setin Hall in my search gievs basically the same lack of results. Fram (talk) 15:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom - fails WP:N. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 08:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. I agree that this article fails WP:N. --Yachtsman1 (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * While I am sympathetic to the deceased, as "no man is an island", I can't find any sources, outside of the blogosphere, that even took note of this report. When it gets better documented, it can be re-created. Userfy or delete. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This is simply not true. Horton and Koppelman both cited it. see http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/01/hbc-90006368. Also, it is a part of a siazble body of work by Prof. Mark Denbeaux and Seton Hall's Center for Policy & Research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shu cpr (talk • contribs) 18:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.