Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 6, 2006 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. I'd removed most of the text and was about to add my 'strong delete' but what the heck? There's absolutely zero chance of this being Kept, so I'm closing now citing WP:SNOW. kingboyk 08:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

June 6, 2006
The whole thing sounds like an advertisment for Slayer. Additionally, the article's content is not widely regarded as factual. There are also highly undesirable suggestions, like "Kill the neighbor's dog and blame it on Slayer." Regalion 03:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to June 6. TheProject 03:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This could be a candidate for speedy deletion, as nonsense. --JChap 03:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirecting is bad, because on June 6, 2006, actual events will happen and this page will be needed for then. Just delete it so that it can be made again easily. Hobbeslover | (talk) (contribs) 03:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, I don't see any pages created for specific days in 2006. I do see a whole load for 2005, though. TheProject 04:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. joturn e r 04:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and blame it on Slayer. --fuzzy510 05:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Vandalize it and kill it and blame it on Slayer. Grand  master  ka  07:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.