Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June Chu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

June Chu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:BLP1E - she does not appear to be notable as an academic, and Yelpgate or whatever it's called isn't nearly significant enough to make her notable now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. BLP1E. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

— 96.233.109.66 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per BLP1E, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:PERP. There is no indication that the current scandal has any lasting notability. Ordinarily for an academic at this level I would suggest to keep the article but recenter it on her academic contributions, but Yale's story from her appointment a year ago doesn't mention any contributions that would be notable for us. Being dean, or former dean, is certainly not enough; we only give automatic notability as academic administrators to heads of whole universities. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is clear per BLP1E. She was not notable prior to the Yelp events, and still isn't. 104.163.153.14 (talk) 22:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. BLP1E is correct. She is neither a movie nor restaurant critic; the entry is simply snarky and without merit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.5.192.253 (talk) 02:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. This doesn't strike me as a BLP1E case at all. Being the dean of a residential college in a notable university and being a lecturer (?) in psychology courses at that university both have some independent worth. The controversy created by her comments and her firing is only part of her notability. I'm generally in favor of keeping BLP articles if they aren't derivative of another article of an event that they're involved in. There isn't such an article yet. 73.61.20.143 (talk) 16:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC) — 73.61.20.143 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep. She has held several academic appointments. Her extra-curricular writings serve as a reminder to all of us on how not to conduct ourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.109.66 (talk) 16:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.