Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jung-ed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Redirect is a good suggestion however the suggested target does not mention this at all. As such, a redirect can be created if the article about the band or a new one about the person contains the term and is referenced. Currently it runs afoul of WP:NEO and thus is not a good redirect term. Regards  So Why  09:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Jung-ed

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Made up word. WP:NEO applies. Author removed PROD.  ttonyb (talk) 07:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Razorflame 09:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-expandable dictionary definition (of a made-up word). AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 10:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Viral marketing, WP:MADEUP --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If it is viral marketing, maybe it ought to be a sentence on the Jessica Jung page. Or rather the teeny tiny section of the Girls Generation page dealing with her. --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 10:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Girls' Generation. TJRC (talk) 03:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.