Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungil Hong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Enough demand for a second chance. Non-admin closure. Shawn Is Here : Now in colors 18:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Jungil Hong

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Declining speedy as notability is debatable. Elevating for a fuller discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 13:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Her work was noted by New York Times, Boston Globe, Providence Journal, Rhode Island State Council on the Arts (RISCA) etc. The coverage is not substantial, but it is in my opinion sufficient. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 21:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep What Vejvančický said above AND that fact that she's a primary artist of the Fort Thunder collective, along with Brian Chippendale (her boyfriend) & Brian Gibson of Lightning Bolt, Mat Brinkman, Jim Drain, Leif Goldberg, Jungil Hong, Xander Marro, & Pippi Zornoza.Endlessmug (talk) 00:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Pretty weak Keep per above - just scrapes through to notability. Johnbod (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per Vejvančický and Johnbod.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per refs given above, but please use them in the article, or at least list them on the article talk page for future use.  Ty  23:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, needs work...Modernist (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.