Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior High Camp (movie)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Junior High Camp (movie)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log) & related redirect:

This was supposed to be created by twinkle but some bug prevented it from being so. Brought to afd cause speedy isn't speedy enough. The article is either blatantly hoax (use this search in google for example:Junior High Camp site:imdb.com) or non-notable, and the article is nothing but an incorrect reference (Schneider's list) and infobox (I put up the speedy tag more than a day ago). &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  01:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Bug aside, you've done the right thing bringing it to AFD. If something sits at CSD for an extended period, it's usually an indication that no admin wants to deal with it, for one reason or another.  And if admins do not feel comfortable speedy deleting something, or comfortable declining the CSD, a full deletion debate is generally a good idea to get a wider range of opinions. - TexasAndroid (talk) 01:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourcable probable hoax. Search with title and alleged production companies find absolutely nothing.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Remember the movie Junior High Camp? It was 3 hours and 40 minutes long, and it came out last August and grossed $321 billion, remember? It's all right here in this article. Oh, wait, nobody could remember that, because there was no such movie. Speedy delete as vandalism in the form of a hoax, and block article creator. I would like to apologize to Noian as an administrator for failing to check Category:Candidates for speedy deletion and speedily delete this article in a timely manner. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No apology needed, we're all volunteers after all. Can't help but wonder if there should be more admins though, the backlog for speedy looks intense (8 days for images?), I'll remember to use Prods/AfD's more often next time, and to let speedy's wait longer. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  04:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - It seems to be is almost certainly a hoax. (The citation uses a page about Schindler's List as "evidence" of the budget.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.