Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior Jedi Knights Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Has been running for more than 14 days with no one advocating keeping. Deor (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Junior Jedi Knights Series

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pulp sci-fi book series that fials to meet WP:NBOOKS. Can't find references from reviews or academic study. Article is completely unreferenced, stub.

I'm also nominating the books in the series as they're similary non-notable. Each article is unreferenced; those that aren't stubs have large in-universe plot descriptions:
 * Mikeblas (talk) 18:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Mikeblas (talk) 18:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - couldn't find anything to suggest any of these are notable. I was thinking that each of the individual books could be merged into the "parent" series article but I'm not sure the series itself is notable.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 05:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, no real coverage of the individual books or of the series. They fail WP:NBOOK. --Bejnar (talk) 03:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.