Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jurassic Galaxy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Jurassic Galaxy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article contains copy paste material. Please find the CopyVios report. Insignificant coverage in reliable secondary sources. None of their other films have standalone Wikipedia pages. Amkgp (talk) 05:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Amkgp (talk) 05:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - After doing a bit of searching, it appears as if this obscure film has gotten only a smattering of attention even from within the film community of those who like these sorts of pictures. The situation seems clear-cut. It's simply not notable, and deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. I did find a couple of blog reviews (mostly explaining how laughably bad the film is) but nothing sufficient to meet the criteria of WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NFILM. Insignificant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Comatmebro (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.