Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juridical racialism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge  to Mark S. Weiner.  Sandstein  21:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Juridical racialism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a non-notable concept that appears essentially only in the writings of a single author and has not been picked up by others. Google books and google scholar each generate five hits. Perhaps this should be placed in an article about the book in which the concept was proposed? Mangostar (talk) 21:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I have boldly merged to Mark S. Weiner, the author. Kevin (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The redirect has been reverted for now, because I jumped the gun, but the author article still has the merged info. If the consensus is to delete, then that article may need to be reverted also. Kevin (talk) 23:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect per above, does not seem notable on it's own. Beeblbrox (talk) 23:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge, It can take a while for a new concept like this to catch on, maybe this one will and maybe not, it's not my field, but until it does, the best place for this material is on the page of the law professor who is proposing this new term.Elan26 (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Elan26
 * Redirect per Kevin's Merge. Although I'm not sure if Mark S. Weiner himself meets WP:BIO. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 00:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect as above. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * merge and comment This particular theory has not yet been picked up by other legal scholars, either because it is very controversial or because it is less than 2 years old. The author himself has been quoted in 17 other accademic journals according to westlaw.com about his other theories in race and the law. Legis Nuntius (talk) 20:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.