Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jurij Moskon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:NAC per WP:SK. Withdrawn nomination with no other delete !votes. Tim Song (talk) 06:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Jurij Moskon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable film editor. The article is an autobiography as well, being written by User:JurijM. His name is mentioned a lot on sites, but he's not the subject of much from what I can tell. Some of his claims are hard to prove as well--he writes that he won an award at the "Mediterranean Film Festival" but a Google search shows that only his personal website says that. Sandor Clegane (talk) 20:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Retract per WP:SNOW.--Sandor Clegane (talk) 02:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 22:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 22:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are too few sources with enough detail to write a proper bio. I searched Kevin (talk) 22:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to Keep now that sources have been found. Kevin (talk) 01:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per a little google-fu. Slovenian sources give him moderate coverage and show him as award-wining: (Google translation to English as George Moškon} lokalno.si, dolenjskilist.si, 24UR.com, rtvslo.si, czp-vecer.si, dnevnik.si. He's listed over at Variety, All Movie Guide, and is in si.wikipedia. WP:V of the article seems possible, and a few of the assertions seem confirmed. However, anglocentricism makes reserach dificult, and its gonna take a lot of work and input from Slovenian Wikipedians. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 23:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per MQS, and please work on your google-fu. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above. --Yerpo (talk) 06:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.