Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jussi Huttunen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion, not even from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Jussi Huttunen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sean ( Ask Me? ) 20:10, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * What is your deletion rationale? Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has served as the head of several major scientific bodies, viz. the International Agency for Research on Cancer and National Public Health Institute of Finland. I mean, assuming that what's in the article is actually true, since it's not referenced, but lack of references isn't a problem to be solved by deletion. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Article seriously needs references, but assuming the presented facts are true the person is easily notable. --hydrox (talk) 10:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Clear keep on basis of GS cites which pass WP:Prof by hundreds of miles and as above. Please will the nominator expand on reasons for deletion or was the nomination just vandalism? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC).


 * A few references have been added. It is possible to add more, if necessary, although even now I have no doubts that this entry deserves inclusion. Viinamakelainen (talk) 14:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.