Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustAnswer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

JustAnswer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Essentially an advertisement, with recent efforts to make it even worse. The WSJ and Tech Crunch items are mere announcements of funding, and there is nothing else even remotely reliable: the HufPost is by a "contributor", which makes it not a reliable source, and bizjournals is a site for PR.  DGG ( talk ) 23:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

*Delete As per nom and above. Fails GNG. Citterz (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per, this is a blatant advertisement on a non notable organization that doesn’t meet WP:NCORP. Celestina007 (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lack coverage in RIS, and fails WP:NCORP. Megtetg34 (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.