Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustGarciaHill.org


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔  03:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

JustGarciaHill.org

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This may not be notable per General notability guidelines. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: It needs more sourcing, but I did find where the two non-primary sources are from places that would be considered reliable. One is from Science (journal), which is apparently fairly particular about publishing articles, and the other is from The Scientist, which also looks to be pretty reliable as well. We do need more coverage, but this makes me a little optimistic about finding such coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that this will likely need people from the science WP to come in, as they'd likely have better access to sources. I'm finding some hits under "Just Garcia Hill" and other similar name variations, and I am finding a hit here but I can't actually check to see how it's mentioned. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.