Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustGarciaHill.org (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  04:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

JustGarciaHill.org
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Some sources, but doesn't appear to meet WP:N. 2014 AfD was no consensus due to low participation. Boleyn (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: This article appears to be the only significant coverage of the website. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: There are about a dozen mentions of the site in journals but nothing extensive, most just name drops. This is typical . It's just not enough for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.